Archive: 2016 - Moldavian Journal of the Physical Sciences

22 Dec 2016

2016
V. 15
3-4
(p.225 - 230)

Comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation

CZU: 544.2

Authors:

Baranov, Serghei

Summary:

Electrodeposition of nanostructures has been considered in terms of the classical Gibbs and the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert theories. Agreement between the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert and Gibbs theories has been obtained. Therefore, there is no contradiction between the Cahn–Hilliard– Hillert and Gibbs theories.

Download PDF

Export Metadata

Google Scholar

<meta name="citation_title" content="Comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation">
<meta name="citation_author" content="Baranov, Serghei">
<meta name="citation_publication_date" content="2016/12/22">
<meta name="citation_journal_title" content="Moldavian Journal of the Physical Sciences">
<meta name="citation_volume" content="15">
<meta name="citation_issue" content="3-4">
<meta name="citation_firstpage" content="225">
<meta name="citation_lastpage" content="230">
<meta name="citation_pdf_url" content="https://ibn.idsi.md/sites/default/files/imag_file/225_230_Comparison%20of%20classical%20nucleation%20theory%20and%20modern%20theory%20of%20phase%20transition%20in%20the%20case%20of%20electrochemical%20nucleation.pdf">

Crossref

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<doi_batch version='4.3.7' xmlns='http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.3.7' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xsi:schemaLocation='http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.3.7 http://www.crossref.org/schema/deposit/crossref4.3.7.xsd'>
<head>
<doi_batch_id>ibn-50390</doi_batch_id>
<timestamp>1597483044</timestamp>
<depositor>
<depositor_name>Information Society Development Instiute, Republic of Moldova</depositor_name>
<email_address>mjps@nanotech.md</email_address>
</depositor>
<registrant>Institutul de Inginerie Electronică şi Nanotehnologii "D. Ghiţu" al AŞM</registrant>
</head>
<body>
<journal>
<journal_metadata>
<full_title>Moldavian Journal of the Physical Sciences</full_title>
<issn media_type='print'>1810648X</issn>
</journal_metadata>
<journal_issue>
<publication_date media_type='print'>
<year>2016</year>
</publication_date>
<issue>3-4(15)</issue>
</journal_issue>
<journal_article publication_type='full_text'><titles>
<title>Comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation</title>
</titles>
<contributors>
<person_name sequence='first' contributor_role='author'>
<given_name>Serghei</given_name>
<surname>Baranov</surname>
</person_name>
</contributors>
<publication_date media_type='print'>
<year>2016</year>
</publication_date>
<pages>
<first_page>225</first_page>
<last_page>230</last_page>
</pages>
</journal_article>
</journal>
</body>
</doi_batch>iven_name>
<surname>Moldoveanu</surname>
</person_name>
<person_name sequence='additional' contributor_role='author'>
<given_name>Oleg</given_name>
<surname>Chiseliţă</surname>
</person_name>
<person_name sequence='additional' contributor_role='author'>
<given_name>Natalia</given_name>
<surname>Chiseliţa</surname>
</person_name>
</contributors>
<publication_date media_type='print'>
<year>2010</year>
</publication_date>
<pages>
<first_page>114</first_page>
<last_page>120</last_page>
</pages>
</journal_article>
</journal>
</body>
</doi_batch>

CERIF

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<CERIF xmlns='urn:xmlns:org:eurocris:cerif-1.5-1' xsi:schemaLocation='urn:xmlns:org:eurocris:cerif-1.5-1 http://www.eurocris.org/Uploads/Web%20pages/CERIF-1.5/CERIF_1.5_1.xsd' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' release='1.5' date='2012-10-07' sourceDatabase='Output Profile'>
<cfResPubl>
<cfResPublId>ibn-ResPubl-50390</cfResPublId>
<cfResPublDate>2016-12-22</cfResPublDate>
<cfVol>15</cfVol>
<cfIssue>3-4</cfIssue>
<cfStartPage>225</cfStartPage>
<cfISSN>1810-648X</cfISSN>
<cfURI>http://mjps.nanotech.md/archive/2016/article/50390</cfURI>
<cfTitle cfLangCode='EN' cfTrans='o'>Comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation</cfTitle>
<cfAbstr cfLangCode='EN' cfTrans='o'>Electrodeposition of nanostructures has been considered in terms of the classical Gibbs and the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert theories. Agreement between the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert and Gibbs theories has been obtained. Therefore, there is no contradiction between the Cahn–Hilliard– Hillert and Gibbs theories. </cfAbstr>
<cfResPubl_Class>
<cfClassId>eda2d9e9-34c5-11e1-b86c-0800200c9a66</cfClassId>
<cfClassSchemeId>759af938-34ae-11e1-b86c-0800200c9a66</cfClassSchemeId>
<cfStartDate>2016-12-22T24:00:00</cfStartDate>
</cfResPubl_Class>
<cfResPubl_Class>
<cfClassId>e601872f-4b7e-4d88-929f-7df027b226c9</cfClassId>
<cfClassSchemeId>40e90e2f-446d-460a-98e5-5dce57550c48</cfClassSchemeId>
<cfStartDate>2016-12-22T24:00:00</cfStartDate>
</cfResPubl_Class>
<cfPers_ResPubl>
<cfPersId>ibn-person-11133</cfPersId>
<cfClassId>49815870-1cfe-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassId>
<cfClassSchemeId>b7135ad0-1d00-11e1-8bc2-0800200c9a66</cfClassSchemeId>
<cfStartDate>2016-12-22T24:00:00</cfStartDate>
</cfPers_ResPubl>
</cfResPubl>
<cfPers>
<cfPersId>ibn-Pers-11133</cfPersId>
<cfPersName_Pers>
<cfPersNameId>ibn-PersName-11133-3</cfPersNameId>
<cfClassId>55f90543-d631-42eb-8d47-d8d9266cbb26</cfClassId>
<cfClassSchemeId>7375609d-cfa6-45ce-a803-75de69abe21f</cfClassSchemeId>
<cfStartDate>2016-12-22T24:00:00</cfStartDate>
<cfFamilyNames>Baranov</cfFamilyNames>
<cfFirstNames>S.</cfFirstNames>
<cfFamilyNames>Баранов</cfFamilyNames>
<cfFirstNames>Сергей</cfFirstNames>
</cfPersName_Pers>
</cfPers>
</CERIF>

BibTeX

@article{ibn_50390,
author = {Baranov, S.A.},
title = {Comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation},
journal = {Moldavian Journal of the Physical Sciences},
year = {2016},
volume = {15 (3-4)},
pages = {225-230},
month = {Dec},
abstract = {(EN) Electrodeposition of nanostructures has been considered in terms of the classical Gibbs and the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert theories. Agreement between the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert and Gibbs theories has been obtained. Therefore, there is no contradiction between the Cahn–Hilliard– Hillert and Gibbs theories. },
url = {https://ibn.idsi.md/vizualizare_articol/50390},
}

DataCite

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<resource xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xmlns='http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3' xsi:schemaLocation='http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-3 http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3/metadata.xsd'>
<creators>
<creator>
<creatorName>Baranov, S.A.</creatorName>
<affiliation>Institutul de Fizică Aplicată al AŞM, Moldova, Republica</affiliation>
</creator>
</creators>
<titles>
<title xml:lang='en'>Comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation</title>
</titles>
<publisher>Instrumentul Bibliometric National</publisher>
<publicationYear>2016</publicationYear>
<relatedIdentifier relatedIdentifierType='ISSN' relationType='IsPartOf'>1810-648X</relatedIdentifier>
<subjects>
<subject schemeURI='http://udcdata.info/' subjectScheme='UDC'>544.2</subject>
</subjects>
<dates>
<date dateType='Issued'>2016-12-22</date>
</dates>
<resourceType resourceTypeGeneral='Text'>Journal article</resourceType>
<descriptions>
<description xml:lang='en' descriptionType='Abstract'>Electrodeposition of nanostructures has been considered in terms of the classical Gibbs and the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert theories. Agreement between the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert and Gibbs theories has been obtained. Therefore, there is no contradiction between the Cahn–Hilliard– Hillert and Gibbs theories. </description>
</descriptions>
<formats>
<format>application/pdf</format>
</formats>
</resource>

Dublin Core

<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/' xmlns:oai_dc='http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xsi:schemaLocation='http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd'>
<dc:creator>Baranov, S.A.</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2016-12-22</dc:date>
<dc:description xml:lang='en'>Electrodeposition of nanostructures has been considered in terms of the classical Gibbs and the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert theories. Agreement between the Cahn–Hilliard–Hillert and Gibbs theories has been obtained. Therefore, there is no contradiction between the Cahn–Hilliard– Hillert and Gibbs theories. </dc:description>
<dc:source>Moldavian Journal of the Physical Sciences 15 (3-4) 225-230</dc:source>
<dc:title>Comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation</dc:title>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
</oai_dc:dc>

“ ... ”

SM ISO690:2012

BARANOV, S.. Comparison of classical nucleation theory and modern theory of phase transition in the case of electrochemical nucleation. In: Moldavian Journal of the Physical Sciences. 2016, nr. 3-4(15), pp. 225-230. ISSN 1810-648X.